header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

Browne Jacobson has strengthened its financial & professional risks team in London with the appointment of Adam Berry and Adam Culy as partners, marking the firm’s tenth London partner hire since April. The dual addition is part of the firm’s accelerated expansion in the disputes and investigations market, driven by rising demand for specialist regulatory and professional liability expertise.

Berry (pictured, left), a financial services investigations specialist with more than 15 years’ experience, joins from roles in private practice, the FCA’s Enforcement Division and Barclays. His work spans FCA/PRA enforcement defence, regulatory enquiries and internal investigations, including significant s.166 Skilled Person reviews. Speaking on his move, Berry said Browne Jacobson’s ‘ambition and client-first approach made this move compelling’ and noted he was ‘excited to help clients navigate an increasingly complex regulatory landscape’.

Culy (right), formerly general counsel of BDO and most recently a litigation partner at Stephenson Harwood, brings deep expertise in professional indemnity disputes, major regulatory investigations and risk management for accountancy firms. Ranked by both Legal 500 UK and Chambers UK, he described joining the firm during its current phase of growth as ‘incredibly exciting’, adding that its ambition and reputation for exceptional service ‘made this an easy choice’.

Jonathan Newbold, partner and head of financial services and insurance (centre), said the appointments ‘further enhance our ability to support clients in the most complex, high-stakes financial services and professional liability matters’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll