header-logo header-logo

Browne Jacobson—Will Thomas

12 May 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Partner joins planning and environment law team

Browne Jacobson’s planning expertise has been strengthened by the appointment of Will Thomas as partner.

He joins the UK and Ireland law firm’s planning and environment law team from Shoosmiths, where he was Principal Associate.

Will specialises in planning and compulsory purchase law. He acts for public and private sector organisations, including land promoters, developers, investors, landowners, local planning authorities and government bodies.

He said: 'At a time when the government wants to turbocharge new housing and infrastructure developments, while encouraging closer collaboration between the public and private sectors, Browne Jacobson is extremely well placed to advise clients across the planning ecosystem.

'There are a broad range of challenges for local authorities, developers and landowners to overcome, and I enjoy steering clients through what remains a complicated planning system with clear and commercial advice.'

Will has returned to Browne Jacobson, where he trained and spent seven years previously. He has more than 10 years’ experience advising on a range of planning matters. These include complex Section 106 agreements, planning appeals, planning land use advice and due diligence, biodiversity net gain requirements, High Court challenges, development consent orders and compulsory purchase orders.

His expertise includes advising on the full spectrum of land types and schemes, such as strategic land, immediate development and regeneration projects.

Laura Hughes, partner and head of public, planning and environment Law at Browne Jacobson, said: 'Planning law is top of the agenda for our public and private sector clients as they grapple with the government’s sweeping planning reforms, so we’re excited to have the opportunity to strengthen our expertise with someone of Will’s calibre.

'Will is particularly adept at dealing with complex Section 106 agreements at the strategic land stage, as well as overseeing land assembly and compulsory purchase elements of brownfield regeneration schemes. Our clients will benefit from his calm confidence, intelligence and deep knowledge of challenging areas of law.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Insurance and corporate teams in London announce double partner hire

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Technology and data practice bolstered by partner hire

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

Set strengthens civil fraud and insolvency offering with new member

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
back-to-top-scroll