header-logo header-logo

Brussels 4 U

27 April 2007 / Richard Frimston
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Is private international law due to meet
its Waterloo? asks Richard Frimston

From 14 November 2007 Eurostar trains from Brussels Midi will no longer arrive at Waterloo, but terminate instead at St Pancras International. With similar ineluctability, the EU white paper—Succession and Wills (Brussels IV) will arrive in 2008 and probably be in force by 2011. Parliament and the Civil Service in England are still attempting to argue that it should never have set off in the first place.

The European Commission has always encouraged the free movement of goods, services and people, and thus mobility of European citizens. In 1999, European ministers agreed that mutual recognition of judicial decisions was one of their three priorities for action and it is now the cornerstone of judicial co-operation in both civil and criminal matters.

Franco Frattini, vice president of the Commission and responsible for justice, freedom and security, said in a press release in February 2005:

“In a Europe without internal frontiers where individuals are free to travel and settle where they wish, buy goods

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
Antonia Glover of Quinn Emanuel outlines sweeping transparency reforms following the work of the Transparency and Open Justice Board in this week's NLJ
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
back-to-top-scroll