header-logo header-logo

Brussels 4 U

27 April 2007 / Richard Frimston
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Is private international law due to meet
its Waterloo? asks Richard Frimston

From 14 November 2007 Eurostar trains from Brussels Midi will no longer arrive at Waterloo, but terminate instead at St Pancras International. With similar ineluctability, the EU white paper—Succession and Wills (Brussels IV) will arrive in 2008 and probably be in force by 2011. Parliament and the Civil Service in England are still attempting to argue that it should never have set off in the first place.

The European Commission has always encouraged the free movement of goods, services and people, and thus mobility of European citizens. In 1999, European ministers agreed that mutual recognition of judicial decisions was one of their three priorities for action and it is now the cornerstone of judicial co-operation in both civil and criminal matters.

Franco Frattini, vice president of the Commission and responsible for justice, freedom and security, said in a press release in February 2005:

“In a Europe without internal frontiers where individuals are free to travel and settle where they wish, buy goods

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll