header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 February 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Building a case: evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7782_burrows

David Burrows reviews the new rule in family proceedings covering evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons
  • New Pt 3A in Family Procedure Rules covers evidence-giving and participation in proceedings of vulnerable persons.
  • Assistance for vulnerable persons is also provided by common law.
  • However, the quality of evidence may be ‘diminished’ by vulnerability (see eg the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999).

With effect from 27 November 2017, the Family Procedure Rules 2010 were amended to include FPR 2010 Part 3A entitled ‘Vulnerable persons: participation in proceedings and giving evidence’.

This is welcome; but may only affect those (a tiny minority?) who can afford the ‘measures’ which have to be paid for. And affording the ‘measures’ or not, Part 3A only deals with half the real issue. Children are ignored. And of that half, the measures proposed in the rules deal only with a small proportion of the real problems for vulnerable parties and witnesses in family proceedings. Family proceedings will still

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll