header-logo header-logo

23 February 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Building a case: evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons

nlj_7782_burrows

David Burrows reviews the new rule in family proceedings covering evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons

  • New Pt 3A in Family Procedure Rules covers evidence-giving and participation in proceedings of vulnerable persons.
  • Assistance for vulnerable persons is also provided by common law.
  • However, the quality of evidence may be ‘diminished’ by vulnerability (see eg the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999).

With effect from 27 November 2017, the Family Procedure Rules 2010 were amended to include FPR 2010 Part 3A entitled ‘Vulnerable persons: participation in proceedings and giving evidence’.

This is welcome; but may only affect those (a tiny minority?) who can afford the ‘measures’ which have to be paid for. And affording the ‘measures’ or not, Part 3A only deals with half the real issue. Children are ignored. And of that half, the measures proposed in the rules deal only with a small proportion of the real problems for vulnerable parties and witnesses in family proceedings. Family proceedings will still

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll