header-logo header-logo

23 February 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Building a case: evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons

nlj_7782_burrows

David Burrows reviews the new rule in family proceedings covering evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons

  • New Pt 3A in Family Procedure Rules covers evidence-giving and participation in proceedings of vulnerable persons.
  • Assistance for vulnerable persons is also provided by common law.
  • However, the quality of evidence may be ‘diminished’ by vulnerability (see eg the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999).

With effect from 27 November 2017, the Family Procedure Rules 2010 were amended to include FPR 2010 Part 3A entitled ‘Vulnerable persons: participation in proceedings and giving evidence’.

This is welcome; but may only affect those (a tiny minority?) who can afford the ‘measures’ which have to be paid for. And affording the ‘measures’ or not, Part 3A only deals with half the real issue. Children are ignored. And of that half, the measures proposed in the rules deal only with a small proportion of the real problems for vulnerable parties and witnesses in family proceedings. Family proceedings will still

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll