header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 February 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Building a case: evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7782_burrows

David Burrows reviews the new rule in family proceedings covering evidence given by children & ‘vulnerable’ persons
  • New Pt 3A in Family Procedure Rules covers evidence-giving and participation in proceedings of vulnerable persons.
  • Assistance for vulnerable persons is also provided by common law.
  • However, the quality of evidence may be ‘diminished’ by vulnerability (see eg the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999).

With effect from 27 November 2017, the Family Procedure Rules 2010 were amended to include FPR 2010 Part 3A entitled ‘Vulnerable persons: participation in proceedings and giving evidence’.

This is welcome; but may only affect those (a tiny minority?) who can afford the ‘measures’ which have to be paid for. And affording the ‘measures’ or not, Part 3A only deals with half the real issue. Children are ignored. And of that half, the measures proposed in the rules deal only with a small proportion of the real problems for vulnerable parties and witnesses in family proceedings. Family proceedings will still

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll