header-logo header-logo

Bullying allegations & the Ministerial Code

04 February 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail
71052
Neil Parpworth looks at current Downing Street shenanigans through the lens of a previous legal challenge
  • Discusses the Ministerial Code and its application. Refers to alleged breach of Covid regulations in Downing Street.
  • Looks at the FDA trade union’s legal challenge to the PM’s exercise of discretion, following allegations the Home Secretary breached the Code.

Ministerial codes represent a means by which members of the executive can be made accountable for their conduct and behaviour in public office. They are commonplace in those countries influenced by the ‘Westminster’ model of government. The current version of the UK Ministerial Code was drawn up by the prime minister (PM) shortly after he succeeded Theresa May as primus inter pares. In keeping with his predecessor’s version, Boris Johnson’s Code declares, among other things, that: ‘Ministers should be professional in all their dealings and treat all those with whom they come into contact with consideration and respect.’

It further declares: ‘Harassing, bullying or other inappropriate or discriminating behaviour whenever it takes place

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll