header-logo header-logo

04 February 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail

Bullying allegations & the Ministerial Code

71052
Neil Parpworth looks at current Downing Street shenanigans through the lens of a previous legal challenge
  • Discusses the Ministerial Code and its application. Refers to alleged breach of Covid regulations in Downing Street.
  • Looks at the FDA trade union’s legal challenge to the PM’s exercise of discretion, following allegations the Home Secretary breached the Code.

Ministerial codes represent a means by which members of the executive can be made accountable for their conduct and behaviour in public office. They are commonplace in those countries influenced by the ‘Westminster’ model of government. The current version of the UK Ministerial Code was drawn up by the prime minister (PM) shortly after he succeeded Theresa May as primus inter pares. In keeping with his predecessor’s version, Boris Johnson’s Code declares, among other things, that: ‘Ministers should be professional in all their dealings and treat all those with whom they come into contact with consideration and respect.’

It further declares: ‘Harassing, bullying or other inappropriate or discriminating behaviour whenever it takes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll