header-logo header-logo

10 September 2025
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bullying & harassment at the Bar

The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found

Harman’s explosive ‘Independent review of bullying, harassment and sexual harassment at the Bar’, published this week, draws on the experience of hundreds of professionals, including those who have been groped, propositioned, shouted at in court and left feeling ‘completely isolated’. Most victims did not report their experience because they feared being labelled a ‘troublemaker’.

‘Bullying, harassment and sexual harassment is a problem at the Bar and on the Bench, within chambers and courtrooms, in open court and behind robing room doors,’ Harman said.

Her review makes 36 recommendations for reform, including proscribing as misconduct any sexual relations between barristers and pupils, mini-pupils or people on work experience. It recommends mandatory anti-bullying and anti-harassment standards, policies and training across the profession, time limits for processing complaints, and the creation of a commissioner for conduct.

Harman’s review proposes abolishing the three-month limit for a barrister to make a complaint against a judge. It also suggests that sanctions decisions against judges are taken by the Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor—to counter the perception that disciplinary action is too soft.

Examples given of judicial bullying included one first-tier tribunal judge with a reputation for bullying juniors, especially women, who is believed to have been spoken to by senior judiciary but with no effect. Harman’s review reports: ‘In a recent case, he refused to deal with female counsel and instead directed his questions to male counsel. He spoke to the female counsel in a negative tone, scoffing and rolling his eyes every time the female counsel spoke. This is apparently not uncommon.’

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said the review made for ‘uncomfortable reading’ and it was ‘imperative that all barristers have a safe working environment’.

Baroness Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, said there are ‘too many examples of judicial bullying… We are currently reviewing the routes available to raise concerns and resolve issues and working to challenge and change unacceptable behaviour.’

Issue: 8130 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll