header-logo header-logo

10 September 2025
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bullying & harassment at the Bar

The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found

Harman’s explosive ‘Independent review of bullying, harassment and sexual harassment at the Bar’, published this week, draws on the experience of hundreds of professionals, including those who have been groped, propositioned, shouted at in court and left feeling ‘completely isolated’. Most victims did not report their experience because they feared being labelled a ‘troublemaker’.

‘Bullying, harassment and sexual harassment is a problem at the Bar and on the Bench, within chambers and courtrooms, in open court and behind robing room doors,’ Harman said.

Her review makes 36 recommendations for reform, including proscribing as misconduct any sexual relations between barristers and pupils, mini-pupils or people on work experience. It recommends mandatory anti-bullying and anti-harassment standards, policies and training across the profession, time limits for processing complaints, and the creation of a commissioner for conduct.

Harman’s review proposes abolishing the three-month limit for a barrister to make a complaint against a judge. It also suggests that sanctions decisions against judges are taken by the Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor—to counter the perception that disciplinary action is too soft.

Examples given of judicial bullying included one first-tier tribunal judge with a reputation for bullying juniors, especially women, who is believed to have been spoken to by senior judiciary but with no effect. Harman’s review reports: ‘In a recent case, he refused to deal with female counsel and instead directed his questions to male counsel. He spoke to the female counsel in a negative tone, scoffing and rolling his eyes every time the female counsel spoke. This is apparently not uncommon.’

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said the review made for ‘uncomfortable reading’ and it was ‘imperative that all barristers have a safe working environment’.

Baroness Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, said there are ‘too many examples of judicial bullying… We are currently reviewing the routes available to raise concerns and resolve issues and working to challenge and change unacceptable behaviour.’

Issue: 8130 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll