header-logo header-logo

Bus ad ban was lawful

01 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Adverts proclaiming “Not gay! Ex-gay, post-gay and proud! Get over it!” were lawfully banned from the sides of London buses, the High Court has ruled.

The adverts were sponsored by Christian charity Core Issues Trust in April 2012, in response to gay rights charity Stonewall’s campaign “Some people are gay. Get over it!”.  

The High Court had earlier ruled that the ban was lawful but the Court of Appeal asked Mrs Justice Lang to reconsider the case.

Core Issues claimed London Mayor Boris Johnson had overstepped his authority by instructing Transport for London (TfL) to ban the adverts in a bid to win over gay rights-supporting voters shortly before the Mayoral election. It said Johnson’s communications advisor had hinted to The Guardian newspaper that he told TfL to ban the adverts, and that Johnson’s role was shown by e-mails revealed by a Freedom of Information request.

However, Lang J ruled this week that TfL took the decision even though the Mayor’s office made its views known. 

Core Issues, which seeks to help people who want to change their sexual preference, described the judgment as “contrived and punitive”, and denied that its campaign was an advert for “gay cure” therapy.

Howard Carter, general counsel at TfL, says: “It was our decision not to run the adverts and there was no improper purpose behind our decision. Our decision was justified.”

 

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll