header-logo header-logo

01 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bus ad ban was lawful

Adverts proclaiming “Not gay! Ex-gay, post-gay and proud! Get over it!” were lawfully banned from the sides of London buses, the High Court has ruled.

The adverts were sponsored by Christian charity Core Issues Trust in April 2012, in response to gay rights charity Stonewall’s campaign “Some people are gay. Get over it!”.  

The High Court had earlier ruled that the ban was lawful but the Court of Appeal asked Mrs Justice Lang to reconsider the case.

Core Issues claimed London Mayor Boris Johnson had overstepped his authority by instructing Transport for London (TfL) to ban the adverts in a bid to win over gay rights-supporting voters shortly before the Mayoral election. It said Johnson’s communications advisor had hinted to The Guardian newspaper that he told TfL to ban the adverts, and that Johnson’s role was shown by e-mails revealed by a Freedom of Information request.

However, Lang J ruled this week that TfL took the decision even though the Mayor’s office made its views known. 

Core Issues, which seeks to help people who want to change their sexual preference, described the judgment as “contrived and punitive”, and denied that its campaign was an advert for “gay cure” therapy.

Howard Carter, general counsel at TfL, says: “It was our decision not to run the adverts and there was no improper purpose behind our decision. Our decision was justified.”

 

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll