header-logo header-logo

10 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Busy in court

The Supreme Court has seen its busiest year to date, hearing 45% more appeals (120) than during 2012/13 and giving 49% more judgments (115). 

Just over a third of applicants were granted permission to appeal, according to the court’s annual report and accounts.

Justices are less likely to sit in panels of larger than five than in previous years—the number of appeals upon which seven or nine Justices sat fell to about 9% of hearings (compared with 11% in the previous year, and 24% in 2011/12 and 2010/11).

Jenny Rowe, chief executive of the court, says the court administration has “continued to deliver our core function of processing casework and providing support to the Justices, against a background of a workload which has become more demanding.”

The accounts showed the court spent £12.7m during the last year, 40% of which was judicial and staff costs, and recouped more than £7.5m in court fees and other income.

According to the report, the court will make projected savings of £65,000 per annum from next year after leaving Ministry of Justice IT contracts and agreeing terms with new suppliers.

Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll