header-logo header-logo

17 November 2016
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

BVI International Arbitration Centre

New IAC will administer arbitrations 

The British Virgin Islands has announced the launch of its International Arbitration Centre (IAC).

The International Arbitration Centre will administer arbitrations under its own rules and will also offer 'ad hoc' or other institutional arbitration.

BVI is well known for the quality of its commercial and appellate courts and for its political stability. BVI is the home to the Eastern Caribbean Commercial Court and its legal system has full recourse into the Privy Council in London.

BVI’s aim is for the IAC to become the regional centre of choice for arbitration arising from business activity worldwide.

While parties will always be free to nominate arbitrators, the BVI IAC will maintain a roster, which, at its inception, will include some 190+ highly regarded international arbitration and dispute resolution practitioners. These will be drawn from both common law and civil law jurisdictions and will be able to conduct arbitrations in a number of languages including English, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, French, German and Italian.

The centre’s Board of Directors is chaired by Mr. John Beechey CBE, former President of the Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce. Francois Lassalle, who has considerable experience as a practice manager of a “Magic Circle” law firm in London, has been appointed CEO of the Centre.

BVI IAC will also provide services such as financial administration, logistical and technical support for meetings and hearings, travel arrangements, and general secretarial and linguistic support.

Lorna Smith, OBE, interim director of BVI Finance said: “BVI is a centre of excellence for global business and dispute resolution. It is based on a legal system founded upon English Common law which will enable us to be a leading jurisdiction providing financial services solutions. The launch of the BVI International Arbitration Centre is a pivotal moment for us and underpins our desire to continue to expand the services BVI offers.”

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll