header-logo header-logo

Caliendo v Mishcon de Reya: post-Mitchell costs

23 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The High Court has granted relief from sanctions to two claimants who were three and a half months late in notifying their defendants about funding agreements due to an “oversight”, in the latest costs ruling to follow Denton and Mitchell .

In Caliendo v Mishcon de Reya [2014] EWHC 3414 (Ch), the claimants were allowed to keep their conditional fee agreements with DLA Piper, even though they should have notified within seven days. The case, which involved a shares dispute with Mishcon, was deferred until after the Mitchell and Denton cases on sanctions under the new post-Jackson review civil procedure rules.

Mr Justice Hildyard found that relief could be granted even though the claimants had no “good reason” for their delay, since the defendants had not been prejudiced by the delay and it would not be “fair, just or appropriate” to deny relief.

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll