header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Mediation
printer mail-detail

A call to ADRms

New wine in old bottles or the nuclear deterrent? Peter Causton discusses mediation post Briggs & the Brexit vote

Much has been written about the effect of Brexit upon the cross border reciprocal arrangements for enforcement of judgments and making claims, but not much about the impact on the advancement of alternative dispute resolution and mediation in the UK, following Brexit and Lord Justice Briggs’s Civil Courts Structure Review.

The EU published its report on the EU Mediation Directive 2008/52/EC on 26 August 2016, following a consultation. It is clear from this report that much has been achieved in promoting mediation in EU member states for civil and commercial disputes, since the directive was introduced. The report says that most member states have extended the measures to domestic cases. However, the Directive has brought about no, or limited, changes to the systems of the 15 states which had a pre-existing system, although four states had adopted mediation systems for the first time.

Mediation

The report identifies difficulties in functioning in practice, mainly related

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll