header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 June 2013 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

A call to arms

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
168438738

Will the government listen to legal campaigners' protests, asks Jon Robins

“I dreamt of the day when the justice department would be surrounded by lawyers demanding justice,” quipped Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour MP for Islington North at this month’s rally outside the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

Who would have thought it, but it turns out that lawyers can put on a very rowdy and effective demo. Hundreds of campaigners crowded into the street outside the MoJ’s Petty France HQ, celebrated for its brutalist architecture, in opposition to the seemingly endless stream of brutal and mindless legal aid policy emanating from inside.

Rallying cries

Beleaguered defence lawyers rubbed shoulders with well-heeled QCs and anti-cuts protestors with their Socialist Worker placards, all enthusiastically joining in the chanting (“Shame on you, Chris Grayling”, “Stop the raid on legal aid”, “No legal aid, no justice” etc).

“This is the last stand,” Kat Craig, solicitor and legal director of the human rights group Reprieve told the crowd. She exhorted lawyers to take industrial action. “If

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll