header-logo header-logo

27 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Call for more public education on legal issues

The Law Society and Legal Services Board (LSB) have called for more public education on legal issues, after commissioning joint research

More than 28,000 people responded to an online survey by the two organisations, ‘Legal needs of individuals’, making it the largest ever survey of legal needs in England and Wales.

However, only 16% of respondents who had experienced a contentious legal issue perceived the issue as ‘legal’ in nature. This affected whether or not they sought legal advice. Those who did seek professional legal advice were more likely to feel they achieved a fair outcome than those who didn’t (66% compared to 53%).

LSB Chair Dr Helen Phillips said the survey ‘reveals a significant access to justice gap. For a variety of reasons people do not always seek legal advice. Many fail to identify the issues they face as being legal in nature. They perhaps class it as a housing issue or a financial problem or put it down to bad luck. This means they then don’t seek for the right kind of help’.

While 92% of respondents believed legal aid was a good thing, an astonishing 85% of those with a household income below the means test threshold did not think they would be eligible for legal aid.

Nine out of ten respondents were satisfied with the service they received from their solicitor, compared to 74% from unregulated providers. 84% felt their solicitor provided value for money. Only one in five respondents had shopped around when choosing a legal service.

Defective goods or services accounted for about one quarter of legal issues experienced by respondents, while 14% suffered anti-social behaviour by neighbours, 11% bought or sold property, 11% made or changed a will and 11% had employment issues.

Simon Davis, President of the Law Society, said the research ‘brings home the need to build better public understanding of legal issues and clear, accessible pathways to get professional legal advice’.

Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll