header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / Charles Davey
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Call of duty?

225839
Charles Davey reports on the police’s duty of care to warn domestic abuse victims of an imminent attack
  • Examines the facts of Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, in which it was found that the police have no duty of care to warn potential victims of danger.

By way of background to Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock [2025] EWCA Civ 13, Mrs W had been in an ‘on-off’ relationship with RG for two years. During that time, Mrs W had made complaints of threats by RG to kill her, RG was convicted of head-butting Mrs W’s husband, and RG had received repeated harassment warnings. RG went on to breach bail conditions on multiple occasions.

On 4 February 2015, Mrs W ended the relationship. She reported that RG had made threats of serious violence to her, her young son and daughter. In that month, RG was ejected from Mrs W’s workplace and arrested for criminal damage and harassment. He was bailed, with prohibitions on contacting Mrs

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll