header-logo header-logo

Calling time on hereditary peers?

11 October 2024 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8089 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail
192564
The Labour government intends to finally see off the ‘rump’ of Lords who inherited their title. Neil Parpworth analyses the proposed reform
  • Potentially ending a process that has lasted a quarter of a century, the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill aims to break the link between the second chamber and hereditary peerage.
  • This article examines the Bill, the views of its champions and detractors, and its likely timeline. It also considers other changes the government may try to implement in the House of Lords.

On 5 September 2024, the recently elected Labour government introduced a Bill in Parliament consisting of a mere five clauses. Despite its brevity, the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill is of constitutional importance in that it strives to bring to an end a process which began 25 years ago, when the House of Lords Act 1999 (HLA 1999) first tackled the issue of hereditary peers acting as legislators. While that Act reflected a compromise in the form of a rump of 92 peers being allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll