header-logo header-logo

11 October 2024 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8089 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail

Calling time on hereditary peers?

192564
The Labour government intends to finally see off the ‘rump’ of Lords who inherited their title. Neil Parpworth analyses the proposed reform
  • Potentially ending a process that has lasted a quarter of a century, the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill aims to break the link between the second chamber and hereditary peerage.
  • This article examines the Bill, the views of its champions and detractors, and its likely timeline. It also considers other changes the government may try to implement in the House of Lords.

On 5 September 2024, the recently elected Labour government introduced a Bill in Parliament consisting of a mere five clauses. Despite its brevity, the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill is of constitutional importance in that it strives to bring to an end a process which began 25 years ago, when the House of Lords Act 1999 (HLA 1999) first tackled the issue of hereditary peers acting as legislators. While that Act reflected a compromise in the form of a rump of 92 peers being allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll