header-logo header-logo

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Privacy , Media
printer mail-detail

Calls for legislation on intimate image abuse

Possession of non-consensual intimate images (NCII) would become a criminal offence similar to that for child sexual abuse material, under proposals launched by a parliamentary committee.

The Women and Equalities Committee called on the government this week to amend the Crime and Policing Bill currently going through Parliament in order to create the offence. It warned this is necessary to force online platforms to delete the images—according to the Revenge Porn Helpline, about 10% of NCII are not removed and continue to be accessible in the UK, often hosted on sites based overseas including some dedicated to NCII abuse.

Currently, the Online Safety Act 2023 creates criminal offences related to the making and sharing of NCII. It gives Ofcom powers to impose fines and order services to take material down.

However, Ofcom’s powers are slow, says Sarah Owen MP, the committee’s chair, and ‘a legal gap remains. NCII can circulate online years after the image was first posted’.

As well as criminalising possession, the committee’s report, ‘Tackling non-consensual intimate image abuse’, published this week, calls for the establishment of an Online Safety Commission. This would be a statutory body akin to the eSafety Commission in Australia, with a focus on support for individuals. The commission would act on behalf of individuals who report NCII content, applying for and sending court orders demanding websites take down content or requiring perpetrators to pay compensation for harm caused.

Owen said: ‘The committee heard shocking evidence of [NCII’s] scale and impact, with a tenfold increase in just four years and more than 22,000 reported cases in 2024.

‘There is also an urgent need for courts to confiscate devices storing NCII content. There have been cases where, following the criminal justice process, perpetrators have had devices containing the NCII returned to them. This is harrowing for victims.’ 

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Privacy , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll