header-logo header-logo

Calls to repeal pre-Victorian vagrancy laws

26 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-detail
A coalition of lawyers, police and homelessness charities has called on the government to scrap the Vagrancy Act 1824, which criminalises rough sleeping and begging.

A report by Crisis, the homelessness charity, published last week, argues that the Act is out of date, inhumane and needlessly pushes vulnerable people further from help. It warns that the Act makes it the responsibility of the police to deal with rough sleeping when a multi-agency approach and use of outreach services is a more helpful approach.

The government has said it will review the Act as part of its rough sleeping strategy. The Vagrancy Act was abolished in Scotland in 1982.

Bindmans partner Mike Schwarz, who contributed to the Crisis report, said: ‘I am really impressed by Crisis’ and others’ initiative to have the antiquated and socially regressive Vagrancy Act reviewed and repealed.

‘It is, literally a pre-Victorian piece of legislation, reflecting the outdated and oppressive views from a bygone era on a section of our community which needs support, rather than criminalisation. The report will, I hope, be the final step towards its abolition.’

The 1824 Act was originally introduced to make it easier for police to deal with destitute soldiers returning from the Napoleonic Wars. It makes it a criminal offence to ‘wander abroad’ or to be ‘in any public place, street, highway, court, or passage, to beg or gather alms’ in England and Wales.

According to a Freedom of Information request made by Crisis to the Ministry of Justice, there were 1,320 recorded prosecutions under the Act in 2018, an increase of 6% on the previous year, but less than half the number made five years ago. 

Between 2014 and 2018, rough sleeping in England rose by 70%.

Homeless people have reported being fined £100 and banned from town centres under the Act, risking prison if they are caught again. However, this can prevent those people using local services for rough sleepers. 

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll