header-logo header-logo

26 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-detail

Calls to repeal pre-Victorian vagrancy laws

A coalition of lawyers, police and homelessness charities has called on the government to scrap the Vagrancy Act 1824, which criminalises rough sleeping and begging.

A report by Crisis, the homelessness charity, published last week, argues that the Act is out of date, inhumane and needlessly pushes vulnerable people further from help. It warns that the Act makes it the responsibility of the police to deal with rough sleeping when a multi-agency approach and use of outreach services is a more helpful approach.

The government has said it will review the Act as part of its rough sleeping strategy. The Vagrancy Act was abolished in Scotland in 1982.

Bindmans partner Mike Schwarz, who contributed to the Crisis report, said: ‘I am really impressed by Crisis’ and others’ initiative to have the antiquated and socially regressive Vagrancy Act reviewed and repealed.

‘It is, literally a pre-Victorian piece of legislation, reflecting the outdated and oppressive views from a bygone era on a section of our community which needs support, rather than criminalisation. The report will, I hope, be the final step towards its abolition.’

The 1824 Act was originally introduced to make it easier for police to deal with destitute soldiers returning from the Napoleonic Wars. It makes it a criminal offence to ‘wander abroad’ or to be ‘in any public place, street, highway, court, or passage, to beg or gather alms’ in England and Wales.

According to a Freedom of Information request made by Crisis to the Ministry of Justice, there were 1,320 recorded prosecutions under the Act in 2018, an increase of 6% on the previous year, but less than half the number made five years ago. 

Between 2014 and 2018, rough sleeping in England rose by 70%.

Homeless people have reported being fined £100 and banned from town centres under the Act, risking prison if they are caught again. However, this can prevent those people using local services for rough sleepers. 

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll