header-logo header-logo

Calls to repeal pre-Victorian vagrancy laws

26 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-detail
A coalition of lawyers, police and homelessness charities has called on the government to scrap the Vagrancy Act 1824, which criminalises rough sleeping and begging.

A report by Crisis, the homelessness charity, published last week, argues that the Act is out of date, inhumane and needlessly pushes vulnerable people further from help. It warns that the Act makes it the responsibility of the police to deal with rough sleeping when a multi-agency approach and use of outreach services is a more helpful approach.

The government has said it will review the Act as part of its rough sleeping strategy. The Vagrancy Act was abolished in Scotland in 1982.

Bindmans partner Mike Schwarz, who contributed to the Crisis report, said: ‘I am really impressed by Crisis’ and others’ initiative to have the antiquated and socially regressive Vagrancy Act reviewed and repealed.

‘It is, literally a pre-Victorian piece of legislation, reflecting the outdated and oppressive views from a bygone era on a section of our community which needs support, rather than criminalisation. The report will, I hope, be the final step towards its abolition.’

The 1824 Act was originally introduced to make it easier for police to deal with destitute soldiers returning from the Napoleonic Wars. It makes it a criminal offence to ‘wander abroad’ or to be ‘in any public place, street, highway, court, or passage, to beg or gather alms’ in England and Wales.

According to a Freedom of Information request made by Crisis to the Ministry of Justice, there were 1,320 recorded prosecutions under the Act in 2018, an increase of 6% on the previous year, but less than half the number made five years ago. 

Between 2014 and 2018, rough sleeping in England rose by 70%.

Homeless people have reported being fined £100 and banned from town centres under the Act, risking prison if they are caught again. However, this can prevent those people using local services for rough sleepers. 

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll