header-logo header-logo

11 June 2021 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7936 / Categories: Features , Public , Local government , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Virtual council meetings: Back to reality

50762
English virtual council meetings? Not a remote chance. Nicholas Dobson reports
  • Primary legislation is required to allow local authority meetings under the Local Government Act 1972 to take place remotely.
  • Where the requirement for such meetings to be ‘open to the public’ or ‘held in public’ applies, members of the public must also be admitted in person.

The Local Government Act 1972 prescribed the core local authority constitutional structure. But when the Act was written, Atari Pong table-tennis was exotic new hi-tech and virtual communications mere science fiction. If ‘remote meeting’ meant anything at all it would have referred to one held in a faraway location. But in 2020 two things shook the local government legal landscape. First, in January 2020 the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) invaded the UK and was not slow to show it meant virulent business. On 25 March this gave rise to the Coronavirus Act 2020, following a four-day warp-speed Parliamentary teleport. And second, (unlike in 1972 when even the humble pocket calculator

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll