header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Can more courts, fewer juries make a difference?

Four Nightingale courts are to be made permanent, as justice ministers continue to grapple with the record-level Crown Court backlog

The buildings, in Fleetwood, Telford, Chichester and Cirencester, comprise 11 courtrooms covering criminal, family and civil cases. Their conversion to a permanent status marks the end of the Nightingale initiative, which converted hotels, offices and conference centres into a total of 60 temporary courtrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Law Society president Mark Evans described the move as ‘sensible’, but urged the government to ‘ensure there are enough judges, court staff and lawyers to work on the cases.

‘To bring down the backlogs and ensure truly swift and fair justice, the government must focus on efficiencies and sustained investment across the entire justice system, including reducing the number of cases coming into the courts.’

Ministers have stepped up efforts to bring the backlog of 80,000 cases down, increasing funding for Crown Courts to sit a record 111,250 days this financial year. The Lord Chancellor David Lammy has proposed radical cuts to jury trials, under which slightly less than half of trials currently heard by a jury would instead be heard by magistrates or a judge sitting alone.

Last week, however, the Institute for Government reported that cutting jury trials—a proposal that is widely opposed within the legal profession—would reduce the Crown Court workload by less than 2%. The institute explains one reason for this is juries will continue to be used in the most serious trials, which tend to take the longest to complete.

Hearing more cases in the magistrates’ court, on the other hand, could save 7%-10%—with the caveat that this would depend on a large number of cases being retained in magistrates’ courts, according to the institute’s report, ‘Trial and error? The impact of restricting jury trials on court demand’. 

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll