header-logo header-logo

Can they sell the libraries?

13 May 2011 / Paul Letman
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail
103015457-1_4

Will a Victorian statute prevent local councils selling off our museums & libraries to make ends meet? Paul Letman investigates

The Victorians were in many respects a public-minded lot, thus to facilitate and encourage grants of land for school sites, and for institutions promoting literature, science and the fine arts, and places of worship, they passed a number of statutes such as the School Sites Acts (SSA) of 1836 to 1844, the Literary and Scientific Institutions Act 1854 (LSIA 1854) and the Places of Worship Sites Act 1873.

SSA 1841 has already been the subject of much judicial attention, as schools established under that Act have been closed over the years. But it is LSIA 1854 that is now under the spotlight, as a result of present day austerity measures and the plans of many local authorities to sell off long established museums and libraries to make ends meet (see the Financial Times 29 March 2011 “Councils in a bind as library sell-off falls foul of Victorian law”).

Reverter provision

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll