header-logo header-logo

23 September 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

R v Broughton: can this be right?

28037
R v Broughton: a strong prosecution case on the face of the evidence, but a quashed conviction. Alec Samuels reviews the case

In brief

  • In Broughton the jury convicted but the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.

At the Bestival musical festival in 2017, the defendant (D) gave and supplied his girlfriend (V) some illegal drugs. Furthermore he ‘bumped them up’, that is to say he added something stronger than was normally to be expected. D took V to an adjoining wood. V took the drugs. V became visibly seriously ill and distressed, showing the classic signs of illegal drug abuse. D did not call the police or the gig officials. D was subject to a suspended sentence, so apprehensive about doing so.

After some delay D did call V’s parents, who lived some hours distance away (and set off by car). Eventually D did call the gig officials; but unfortunately there was a misunderstanding over location, and it took quite a long time finally to locate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll