header-logo header-logo

17 April 2014 / Beverley Taylor , Sophy Miles
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Capacity in crisis?

Sophy Miles & Beverley Taylor highlight the problems stemming from the Mental Capacity Act 2005

The House of Lords Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act has recently condemned the failure to implement a “visionary” piece of legislation which “had the potential to transform the lives of many”. In a stinging report, the committee described one part of the legislation, the controversial deprivation of liberty safeguards (DOLS), as unfit for purpose.

The committee described its work as “shining a light” on an area of public policy which might otherwise have been neglected. At the start of its work it was told by officials from the Ministry of Justice and the Department of Health that the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) was “a success”. As the evidence emerged it became clear that this assessment was over-optimistic. By the concluding sessions the minister of state for care and support, Norman Lamb, had accepted that the implementation and understanding of the Act was a “work in progress”. The government has established a Mental Capacity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll