header-logo header-logo

Capacity in crisis?

17 April 2014 / Beverley Taylor , Sophy Miles
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Sophy Miles & Beverley Taylor highlight the problems stemming from the Mental Capacity Act 2005

The House of Lords Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act has recently condemned the failure to implement a “visionary” piece of legislation which “had the potential to transform the lives of many”. In a stinging report, the committee described one part of the legislation, the controversial deprivation of liberty safeguards (DOLS), as unfit for purpose.

The committee described its work as “shining a light” on an area of public policy which might otherwise have been neglected. At the start of its work it was told by officials from the Ministry of Justice and the Department of Health that the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) was “a success”. As the evidence emerged it became clear that this assessment was over-optimistic. By the concluding sessions the minister of state for care and support, Norman Lamb, had accepted that the implementation and understanding of the Act was a “work in progress”. The government has established a Mental Capacity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll