header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7603

17 April 2014
IN THIS ISSUE

Tom Walker & Richard Marshall explain why some employees may have less waiting time between jobs in future

Does the Johnson exclusion zone apply to constructive dismissal? Anna Macey reports

Robert O’Leary returns to the subject of who bears the risk for a working prisoner’s negligence

Alexander Bastin assesses the impact of Daejan Investments v Benson...a year on

Sophy Miles & Beverley Taylor highlight the problems stemming from the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Is there a right to inspect a defendant’s liability insurance, ask Rawdon Crozier & Anthony Eskander

Peter Vaines calls for greater security for taxpayers against negligence charges & a dose of common sense

R (on the application of JC and another) v Central Criminal Court [2014] EWHC 1041 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 53 (Apr)

Ryanair Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioner [2014] EWCA Civ 410, [2014] All ER (D) 44 (Apr)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll