header-logo header-logo

Who carries the can?

17 April 2014 / Robert O'Leary
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Robert O’Leary returns to the subject of who bears the risk for a working prisoner’s negligence

Who should bear the risk if a working prisoner negligently injures a member of the prison staff (or, for that matter, another working prisoner)?

In Cox v MoJ [2014] EWCA Civ 132, [2014] All ER (D) 183 (Feb) the claimant (C) was the catering department manager at HMP Swansea. The population of over 400 inmates was fed with meals prepared in the prison kitchen. The catering department comprised four members of staff and 20 prisoners who assisted in the preparation of food and in the delivery of goods from suppliers into the stores. During one such delivery, someone dropped a sack of rice. C, having instructed the prisoners to stop what they were doing, knelt beside the broken sack to prevent its contents spilling into a walkway. As she was doing so, a prisoner (P) tried to pass her carrying two 25kg sacks and stumbled, dropping them and injuring the claimant. By the appeal it was not in dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll