header-logo header-logo

17 April 2014 / Robert O'Leary
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Who carries the can?

Robert O’Leary returns to the subject of who bears the risk for a working prisoner’s negligence

Who should bear the risk if a working prisoner negligently injures a member of the prison staff (or, for that matter, another working prisoner)?

In Cox v MoJ [2014] EWCA Civ 132, [2014] All ER (D) 183 (Feb) the claimant (C) was the catering department manager at HMP Swansea. The population of over 400 inmates was fed with meals prepared in the prison kitchen. The catering department comprised four members of staff and 20 prisoners who assisted in the preparation of food and in the delivery of goods from suppliers into the stores. During one such delivery, someone dropped a sack of rice. C, having instructed the prisoners to stop what they were doing, knelt beside the broken sack to prevent its contents spilling into a walkway. As she was doing so, a prisoner (P) tried to pass her carrying two 25kg sacks and stumbled, dropping them and injuring the claimant. By the appeal it was not in dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll