header-logo header-logo

28 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Capita: lost in translation?

Interpreting service under fire from top family judge for High Court no-show

A top judge has slated the performance of Capita, the providers of the court interpreting service, after a hearing had to be adjourned when interpreters failed to turn up.

Sir James Munby, president of the Family Division, criticised Capita for not supplying two Slovak-speaking interpreters, as requested, for not giving notice of their non-appearance until 2pm the day before the hearing, and for having too few suitably qualified interpreters.

The case, In the matter of J and S (Children) [2014] EWFC 4, involved the adoption of two Roma children by a same-sex couple, which the parents opposed.

Sir James said: “It would have been unjust, indeed inhumane, to continue with the final hearing of applications as significant as those before me—this, after all, was their final opportunity to prevent the adoption of their children—if the parents were unable to understand what was being said. 

“Anyone tempted to suggest that an adjournment was not necessary might care to consider what our reaction would be if an English parent before a foreign court in similar circumstances was not provided with an interpreter.”

Sir James expressed particular concern at the “revelation that on 7 May 2014 Capita had only 29 suitably qualified Slovak language interpreters on its books (only 13 within a 100 miles radius of the Royal Courts of Justice) whereas it was requested to provide 39 such interpreters for court hearings that day. This is on any view a concerning state of affairs. If the consequence is that a hearing such as that before me on 7 May 2014 has to be abandoned then that is an unacceptable state of affairs. It might be thought that something needs to be done.”

Dismissing the parents’ application to oppose the adoption, Sir James said: “The parents’ views, whether religious, cultural, secular or social, are entitled to respect but cannot be determinative.”

A Capita spokesperson said they did not comment on individual hearings, but had a process in place to advise courts directly if they are unable to meet requirements. She added that, on the date in question, Capita “successfully fulfilled 39 court requests for Slovak translators”.  

 

Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll