header-logo header-logo

14 October 2010
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Capital gains

London leading the way on arbitration

London is the preferred seat of arbitration among global corporate counsel, new research shows.

Four out of 10 corporate counsel say they use English law most frequently, followed by 17% who use New York law, according to a major survey, Choices in International Arbitration, published by  Queen Mary, University of London (QMUL).

“Formal legal infrastructure” is the strongest influence on choice of seat, and London is the most preferred seat of arbitration (30%), followed by Geneva (9%), Paris, Tokyo and Singapore (each 7%) and New York (6%). Respondents have the most negative perception of Moscow and Mainland China. 

The International Chamber of Commerce (ILL) is the most preferred and widely used arbitration institution (50%), although there was a perception among a majority of interviewees that ICC arbitration is too expensive and that arbitration institutions in general are costly.

Professor Loukas Mistelis, director of the School of International Arbitration at QMUL, says: “[The survey] shows that corporations exercise strong preferences regarding the law that governs disputes and London comes out as a clear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll