header-logo header-logo

13 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-detail

Career paths of BAME solicitors

Law Society research into the experiences of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) solicitors has highlighted a clear disparity in career paths and representation across different firm types

Some 17.5% of practice certificate holders come from BAME groups (compared to 14.1% of the wider working population), but 10% of this number is made of Asian solicitors while only 3% of the profession would classify themselves as Black.

Almost a quarter of all solicitors in small firms are BAME, but in the largest firms only one in ten solicitors are BAME, according to the Law Society report, ‘Race for inclusion: the experiences of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic solicitors’, published this week. BAME solicitors are twice as likely as non-BAME solicitors to be sole practitioners, while BAME solicitors who are partners are much more likely to be working in smaller firms.

Breaking down the figures further, 8% of partners in 50+ partner firms are BAME, compared to 34% of partners in single-partner firms.

Nearly a quarter (24%) of BAME respondents reported severe or extreme stress compared to 18% of white solicitors.

There was also a visible pay and hours gap. BAME solicitors worked an average of 1.5 hours more per week full-time and 0.9 hours more per week part-time than their non-BAME counterparts.

In terms of salary, however, the average for non-BAME was £36.13 per hour compared to £27.01 for BAME solicitors.

Some 13% of BAME solicitors reported adverse discrimination and 16% reported bullying.

A third of Black African and Caribbean solicitors said they have experienced some form of discrimination or bullying in the workplace―the highest figure reported by any ethnic group.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘George Floyd’s death and the Black Lives Matter protests shone a light on the racial inequalities and injustices that persist around the world.

‘The movement has undoubtedly increased the focus on these issues in the legal profession and provided a much-needed opportunity for reflection. The law can offer an incredibly fulfilling, varied career and diversity in the profession has continued to grow, but like every sector we need to have some frank conversations.

‘Our research shows that there are barriers for BAME practitioners at every step of their career―including the ethnicity pay gap, microaggressions and the need to fit a certain culture to progress. This often results in BAME solicitors voting with their feet and moving to in-house roles or to become sole practitioners because of barriers to progression and to reaching partnership in larger firms.

‘Our survey contains clear recommendations for firms―such as having open, honest conversations about race and what needs to change in their organisation, blind and contextualised recruitment, set targets for senior leaders and at key points in the pipeline, and a data-driven approach to diversity and inclusion.’

The research can be found at: bit.ly/3qEAZvX.

Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll