header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Steven Gallagher
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Carousel antiques

Carousel fraud is expanding into the antiques trade. Steven Gallagher explains how

The EU estimates more money is lost to missing trader intra-community (MTIC) or carousel fraud each year than the £34.2bn spent on the Common Agricultural Policy (The Guardian, 17 March 2007).

Carousel fraud is most commonly effected using small, portable high value goods such as mobile telephones, and owes its existence to one of the core principles of the EU—the abolition of tax duties between member states, an objective of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 (77/388/EEC), which acknowledged that member states should be able to take limited special measures derogating from the Directive to avoid fraud.

Ruffles and Williams (2005) identified two forms of MTIC or carousel fraud in the Report on Impact of MTIC on UK Trade Statistics:
- A trader in one member state supplies goods to another trader in a different member state. Such supplies are usually VAT-free. The second trader supplies the goods to a consumer charging VAT and should account for this. However, he disappears without paying any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll