header-logo header-logo

Carousel antiques

19 July 2007 / Steven Gallagher
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Carousel fraud is expanding into the antiques trade. Steven Gallagher explains how

The EU estimates more money is lost to missing trader intra-community (MTIC) or carousel fraud each year than the £34.2bn spent on the Common Agricultural Policy (The Guardian, 17 March 2007).

Carousel fraud is most commonly effected using small, portable high value goods such as mobile telephones, and owes its existence to one of the core principles of the EU—the abolition of tax duties between member states, an objective of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 (77/388/EEC), which acknowledged that member states should be able to take limited special measures derogating from the Directive to avoid fraud.

Ruffles and Williams (2005) identified two forms of MTIC or carousel fraud in the Report on Impact of MTIC on UK Trade Statistics:
- A trader in one member state supplies goods to another trader in a different member state. Such supplies are usually VAT-free. The second trader supplies the goods to a consumer charging VAT and should account for this. However, he disappears without paying any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll