header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Steven Gallagher
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Carousel antiques

Carousel fraud is expanding into the antiques trade. Steven Gallagher explains how

The EU estimates more money is lost to missing trader intra-community (MTIC) or carousel fraud each year than the £34.2bn spent on the Common Agricultural Policy (The Guardian, 17 March 2007).

Carousel fraud is most commonly effected using small, portable high value goods such as mobile telephones, and owes its existence to one of the core principles of the EU—the abolition of tax duties between member states, an objective of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 (77/388/EEC), which acknowledged that member states should be able to take limited special measures derogating from the Directive to avoid fraud.

Ruffles and Williams (2005) identified two forms of MTIC or carousel fraud in the Report on Impact of MTIC on UK Trade Statistics:
- A trader in one member state supplies goods to another trader in a different member state. Such supplies are usually VAT-free. The second trader supplies the goods to a consumer charging VAT and should account for this. However, he disappears without paying any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll