header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Carriage by air—Carriage of passengers—Liability of carrier

Dawson v Thomson Airways Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 845, [2014] All ER (D) 154 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Moore-Bick, Kitchin and Fulford LJJ, 19 Jun 2014

The English courts are bound to follow and apply the decisions of the European Court of Justice in relation to the nature of the claim for compensation under Art 7 of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 261/2004 and its compatibility with the Montreal Convention.

Akhil Shah QC (instructed by Bott & Co) for the claimant. Robert Lawson QC (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP) for the defendant.

In December 2006, the claimant was due to fly with the defendant airline from Gatwick airport to the Dominican Republic. His flight was delayed due to crew shortages caused by sickness and arrived at its destination over six hours late. In December 2012, shortly before the expiration of the limitation period under s 9 of the Limitation Act 1980, the claimant issued proceedings seeking to recover compensation from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll