header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Carriage by air—Carriage of passengers—Liability of carrier

Dawson v Thomson Airways Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 845, [2014] All ER (D) 154 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Moore-Bick, Kitchin and Fulford LJJ, 19 Jun 2014

The English courts are bound to follow and apply the decisions of the European Court of Justice in relation to the nature of the claim for compensation under Art 7 of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 261/2004 and its compatibility with the Montreal Convention.

Akhil Shah QC (instructed by Bott & Co) for the claimant. Robert Lawson QC (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP) for the defendant.

In December 2006, the claimant was due to fly with the defendant airline from Gatwick airport to the Dominican Republic. His flight was delayed due to crew shortages caused by sickness and arrived at its destination over six hours late. In December 2012, shortly before the expiration of the limitation period under s 9 of the Limitation Act 1980, the claimant issued proceedings seeking to recover compensation from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll