header-logo header-logo

Carriage by air—Carriage of passengers—Liability of carrier

27 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Dawson v Thomson Airways Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 845, [2014] All ER (D) 154 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Moore-Bick, Kitchin and Fulford LJJ, 19 Jun 2014

The English courts are bound to follow and apply the decisions of the European Court of Justice in relation to the nature of the claim for compensation under Art 7 of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 261/2004 and its compatibility with the Montreal Convention.

Akhil Shah QC (instructed by Bott & Co) for the claimant. Robert Lawson QC (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP) for the defendant.

In December 2006, the claimant was due to fly with the defendant airline from Gatwick airport to the Dominican Republic. His flight was delayed due to crew shortages caused by sickness and arrived at its destination over six hours late. In December 2012, shortly before the expiration of the limitation period under s 9 of the Limitation Act 1980, the claimant issued proceedings seeking to recover compensation from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll