header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007 / Adam Samuel
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Carrots and sticks

Will the new complaint rules make solicitors more accountable? asks Adam Samuel

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and its Solicitors’ Code of Conduct will impose a huge change in the way firms handle complaints after July 2007. The appearance of more detailed rules and guidelines to replace the current loose provisions should benefit those practices that use the opportunity to review their relationships with their clients. For the rest, the new rules could easily become a stick with which the SRA might choose to beat them.

Outgoing rules

Solicitors’ Practice Rule 15 requires a firm to operate a complaints handling procedure in accordance with the Client Care Code. Paragraph 7(b) of that insists that every principal in private practice or recognised body ensures that the practice or body has a complaints procedure, follows it, that clients are told who to contact with concerns about service and that a copy of the procedure is given to them on request. The rules say nothing of the procedure’s required content. This is not a demanding rule.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll