header-logo header-logo

Carrots and sticks

07 June 2007 / Adam Samuel
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Will the new complaint rules make solicitors more accountable? asks Adam Samuel

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and its Solicitors’ Code of Conduct will impose a huge change in the way firms handle complaints after July 2007. The appearance of more detailed rules and guidelines to replace the current loose provisions should benefit those practices that use the opportunity to review their relationships with their clients. For the rest, the new rules could easily become a stick with which the SRA might choose to beat them.

Outgoing rules

Solicitors’ Practice Rule 15 requires a firm to operate a complaints handling procedure in accordance with the Client Care Code. Paragraph 7(b) of that insists that every principal in private practice or recognised body ensures that the practice or body has a complaints procedure, follows it, that clients are told who to contact with concerns about service and that a copy of the procedure is given to them on request. The rules say nothing of the procedure’s required content. This is not a demanding rule.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll