header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007 / Eleanor Furniss
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Carte blanche for hire purchase sharks?

A loophole in statutory protection for customers entering into hire purchase agreements has been exposed, says Eleanor Furniss

The recent case of Black Horse Ltd v Langford [2007] EWHC 907 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 214 (Apr) has exposed a loophole in the protection offered to consumers entering into hire purchase or other agreements falling within the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974), s 12(a). While it is clear that Black Horse itself was not acting in a manner designed to circumvent CCA 1974, the case has highlighted a means by which other finance companies could do so.

STATUTORY PROTECTION FOR THE CONSUMER

All hire purchase agreements are regulated consumer credit agreements to finance a transaction between the debtor and the creditor, falling within s 12(a).
The person with whom the debtor ordinarily negotiates to enter into a hire purchase agreement is the car dealer. At common law the dealer will not normally be the agent of the creditor (see Branwhite v Worcester Works Finance Ltd [1968] 3 All ER 104), and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll