header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007 / Eleanor Furniss
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Carte blanche for hire purchase sharks?

A loophole in statutory protection for customers entering into hire purchase agreements has been exposed, says Eleanor Furniss

The recent case of Black Horse Ltd v Langford [2007] EWHC 907 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 214 (Apr) has exposed a loophole in the protection offered to consumers entering into hire purchase or other agreements falling within the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974), s 12(a). While it is clear that Black Horse itself was not acting in a manner designed to circumvent CCA 1974, the case has highlighted a means by which other finance companies could do so.

STATUTORY PROTECTION FOR THE CONSUMER

All hire purchase agreements are regulated consumer credit agreements to finance a transaction between the debtor and the creditor, falling within s 12(a).
The person with whom the debtor ordinarily negotiates to enter into a hire purchase agreement is the car dealer. At common law the dealer will not normally be the agent of the creditor (see Branwhite v Worcester Works Finance Ltd [1968] 3 All ER 104), and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll