header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 May 2007 / Eleanor Furniss
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Carte blanche for hire purchase sharks?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

A loophole in statutory protection for customers entering into hire purchase agreements has been exposed, says Eleanor Furniss

The recent case of Black Horse Ltd v Langford [2007] EWHC 907 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 214 (Apr) has exposed a loophole in the protection offered to consumers entering into hire purchase or other agreements falling within the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974), s 12(a). While it is clear that Black Horse itself was not acting in a manner designed to circumvent CCA 1974, the case has highlighted a means by which other finance companies could do so.

STATUTORY PROTECTION FOR THE CONSUMER

All hire purchase agreements are regulated consumer credit agreements to finance a transaction between the debtor and the creditor, falling within s 12(a).
The person with whom the debtor ordinarily negotiates to enter into a hire purchase agreement is the car dealer. At common law the dealer will not normally be the agent of the creditor (see Branwhite v Worcester Works Finance Ltd [1968] 3 All ER 104), and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll