header-logo header-logo

08 January 2020 / Kathryn Garbett , Mehmet Karagoz
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Catch them if you can

13680
Malicious prosecution of civil claims—a difficult claim to pursue. Kathryn Garbett & Mehmet Karagoz report
  • The findings in Willers v Joyce & Nugent which considered a claim for malicious prosecution of a civil claim. The claim was unsuccessful and the decision shed light on the matters the court will consider in this type of claim.

In Willers v Joyce & Nugent ([2018] EWHC 3424 (Ch)) Mrs Justice Rose DBE (as she then was) considered Mr Willers’s claim for malicious prosecution of a civil claim against Mr Gubay. The claim was initially struck out on the grounds that there was no tort known to English law of malicious prosecution where the case which is alleged to have been maliciously brought was a civil action rather than a criminal prosecution (Willers v Gubay [2015] EWHC 1315 (Ch)). The judge who struck out the claim granted a ‘leapfrog’ certificate so the case could proceed directly to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held by a majority of five to four

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll