header-logo header-logo

08 January 2020 / Kathryn Garbett , Mehmet Karagoz
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Catch them if you can

13680
Malicious prosecution of civil claims—a difficult claim to pursue. Kathryn Garbett & Mehmet Karagoz report
  • The findings in Willers v Joyce & Nugent which considered a claim for malicious prosecution of a civil claim. The claim was unsuccessful and the decision shed light on the matters the court will consider in this type of claim.

In Willers v Joyce & Nugent ([2018] EWHC 3424 (Ch)) Mrs Justice Rose DBE (as she then was) considered Mr Willers’s claim for malicious prosecution of a civil claim against Mr Gubay. The claim was initially struck out on the grounds that there was no tort known to English law of malicious prosecution where the case which is alleged to have been maliciously brought was a civil action rather than a criminal prosecution (Willers v Gubay [2015] EWHC 1315 (Ch)). The judge who struck out the claim granted a ‘leapfrog’ certificate so the case could proceed directly to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held by a majority of five to four

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll