header-logo header-logo

15 December 2023 / Victoria Oliver
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Cauda Equina Syndrome: Why we need to do more to help

151435
The fanfare around the launch of a CES gateway was justified, but more needs to be done for sufferers, says Victoria Oliver

The cauda equina, we all have one, nestled at the base of our spine this collection of nerves has earned its name because of its resemblance to a horse’s tail or cauda equina in Latin.

Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a very rare but serious condition, where the bundle of nerves get compressed by the vertebral discs. Once compression is identified, usually via MRI, urgent surgery is typically the treatment of choice, with the goal being to free up the compressed nerve roots and give them the best chance of recovery possible. Prompt treatment and good rehab can often leave people with limited ongoing symptoms. However, delay or failure to treat can result in significantly impaired mobility, including permanent paralysis and can also impact a person’s bowel, bladder and sexual function leaving the sufferer incontinent.

Lifechanging

In short, CES is a lifechanging condition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll