header-logo header-logo

15 December 2023 / Victoria Oliver
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Cauda Equina Syndrome: Why we need to do more to help

151435
The fanfare around the launch of a CES gateway was justified, but more needs to be done for sufferers, says Victoria Oliver

The cauda equina, we all have one, nestled at the base of our spine this collection of nerves has earned its name because of its resemblance to a horse’s tail or cauda equina in Latin.

Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a very rare but serious condition, where the bundle of nerves get compressed by the vertebral discs. Once compression is identified, usually via MRI, urgent surgery is typically the treatment of choice, with the goal being to free up the compressed nerve roots and give them the best chance of recovery possible. Prompt treatment and good rehab can often leave people with limited ongoing symptoms. However, delay or failure to treat can result in significantly impaired mobility, including permanent paralysis and can also impact a person’s bowel, bladder and sexual function leaving the sufferer incontinent.

Lifechanging

In short, CES is a lifechanging condition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll