header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 May 2011 / Helen Wolstenholme
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Causation & principle

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
pi_wolstenholme_4

Helen Wolstenholme reports on the repercussions of accidents at work & in the swimming pool

Personal injury lawyers have kept the Court of Appeal busy recently. Of particular note was Dalling v RJ Heale & Co Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 365, [2011] All ER (D) 54 (Apr), in which the court grappled with causation in a case where it was argued that the accident for which the defendant was responsible had caused the claimant to suffer a second accident and injury, but the defendant relied upon novus actus interveniens. Also notable was Woodland v Stopford & others [2011] EWCA Civ 266, [2011] All ER (D) 185 (Mar), where the court reviewed the principles to be applied when considering an application to withdraw a pre-action admission in a personal injury case.

Woodland

Ward LJ described Woodland as “a very sad case indeed”. The claimant, who was aged 10 at the date of the accident in July 2000, suffered a hypoxic brain injury when she lost control during a swimming lesson. The injuries sustained

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll