header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 May 2011 / Helen Wolstenholme
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Causation & principle

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
pi_wolstenholme_4

Helen Wolstenholme reports on the repercussions of accidents at work & in the swimming pool

Personal injury lawyers have kept the Court of Appeal busy recently. Of particular note was Dalling v RJ Heale & Co Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 365, [2011] All ER (D) 54 (Apr), in which the court grappled with causation in a case where it was argued that the accident for which the defendant was responsible had caused the claimant to suffer a second accident and injury, but the defendant relied upon novus actus interveniens. Also notable was Woodland v Stopford & others [2011] EWCA Civ 266, [2011] All ER (D) 185 (Mar), where the court reviewed the principles to be applied when considering an application to withdraw a pre-action admission in a personal injury case.

Woodland

Ward LJ described Woodland as “a very sad case indeed”. The claimant, who was aged 10 at the date of the accident in July 2000, suffered a hypoxic brain injury when she lost control during a swimming lesson. The injuries sustained

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll