header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Cause & effect

web_sullivanl

The issues of duty of care & causation have been under consideration again, notes Karen O’Sullivan

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in an interesting case which re-visited issues of duty of care and causation, called Morcom v Biddick [2014] EWCA Civ 182, [2014] All ER (D) 248 (Feb).

The claimant, a long-time acquaintance of the elderly defendant, agreed to fit insulation to the defendant’s loft hatch. The claimant was a professional handyman who previously worked for the defendant, sometimes paid and sometimes not. The defendant was conscious of the risk of the hatch opening beneath his weight or due to the vibration of his drill. To counteract that, the defendant agreed to ensure that the latch stayed shut by holding it in the locked position using the pole used to lock and unlock the hatch. After some minutes, the telephone rang and the defendant left to answer it. During his short conversation, the loft hatch came open and the claimant fell through the hatch, sustaining serious injuries.

The likely cause

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll