header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Cause & effect

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
14 May 2020 / Joshua Munro , Theo Barclay
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
20699
Business interruption insurance & COVID-19: causation & quantum issues. Theo Barclay & Joshua Munro report

In brief

  • Causation: variation due to different types of policy.
  • Mitigation: a hostile battleground.
  • ‘Other circumstances’ clauses: underlying market trends.
  • Quantum: detailed mechanisms of calculation.

Whether a business has cover for losses caused by COVID-19 and/or the lockdown depends, of course, on policy terms. Even if there is cover, insurers may have interesting defences on points of causation and/or loss, as discussed below. If claims are not carefully formulated as to causation and quantum from the outset and/or are not based on appropriate facts, they may fail.

Causation

The causation issues engaged will vary for the different types of policy under which claims are likely to be made:

  • Business interruption (BI) policies covering losses caused by restrictions imposed as a result of a notifiable disease; and
  • BI policies covering losses caused by physical damage to premises.
BI policies covering losses caused by restrictions imposed as a result of a notifiable disease

Most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll