header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 May 2020 / Joshua Munro , Theo Barclay
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Cause & effect

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
20699
Business interruption insurance & COVID-19: causation & quantum issues. Theo Barclay & Joshua Munro report

In brief

  • Causation: variation due to different types of policy.
  • Mitigation: a hostile battleground.
  • ‘Other circumstances’ clauses: underlying market trends.
  • Quantum: detailed mechanisms of calculation.

Whether a business has cover for losses caused by COVID-19 and/or the lockdown depends, of course, on policy terms. Even if there is cover, insurers may have interesting defences on points of causation and/or loss, as discussed below. If claims are not carefully formulated as to causation and quantum from the outset and/or are not based on appropriate facts, they may fail.

Causation

The causation issues engaged will vary for the different types of policy under which claims are likely to be made:

  • Business interruption (BI) policies covering losses caused by restrictions imposed as a result of a notifiable disease; and
  • BI policies covering losses caused by physical damage to premises.
BI policies covering losses caused by restrictions imposed as a result of a notifiable disease

Most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll