header-logo header-logo

Caution urged on mass claims

08 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Regulators have warned law firms working on financial product mis-selling claims not to breach their professional obligations

In a warning notice, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) expressed concern about improper practices in the mass claims sector, including ‘firms starting to act, and generate costs, before gaining a client’s consent’, ‘poor due diligence during client onboarding leading to low quality and/or inaccurate claims being progressed’, and ‘failures to act promptly or adequately in response to client instructions’.

The SRA said its existing concerns have been heightened by recent attention on the potential for mass claims over car finance customers being charged too much interest, which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is currently investigating.

In particular, the SRA is ‘particularly concerned about potential issues regarding firms getting proper instructions from clients and supervising staff in relation to financial services claims when part of high-volume/bulk claim processes involving multiple clients’.

SRA guidance issued alongside the warning notice covers the areas of concern as well as wider areas such as working with third parties and levels of charges.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘How mass claims are handled is a topic which regularly causes us, and others such as the FCA, concern.

‘Whichever mass claims area they are working in, solicitors’ obligations are very clear. We expect the profession to treat clients as individuals, not just a number within a group. This means, for example, communicating with them clearly, giving them a proper assessment of their specific case and related decisions to be made, and asking them for consent before taking any actions in their name. Basically, making sure they adhere to their overall obligation to act in their clients’ interests at all times.’

Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll