header-logo header-logo

Caution urged on mass claims

08 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Regulators have warned law firms working on financial product mis-selling claims not to breach their professional obligations

In a warning notice, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) expressed concern about improper practices in the mass claims sector, including ‘firms starting to act, and generate costs, before gaining a client’s consent’, ‘poor due diligence during client onboarding leading to low quality and/or inaccurate claims being progressed’, and ‘failures to act promptly or adequately in response to client instructions’.

The SRA said its existing concerns have been heightened by recent attention on the potential for mass claims over car finance customers being charged too much interest, which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is currently investigating.

In particular, the SRA is ‘particularly concerned about potential issues regarding firms getting proper instructions from clients and supervising staff in relation to financial services claims when part of high-volume/bulk claim processes involving multiple clients’.

SRA guidance issued alongside the warning notice covers the areas of concern as well as wider areas such as working with third parties and levels of charges.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘How mass claims are handled is a topic which regularly causes us, and others such as the FCA, concern.

‘Whichever mass claims area they are working in, solicitors’ obligations are very clear. We expect the profession to treat clients as individuals, not just a number within a group. This means, for example, communicating with them clearly, giving them a proper assessment of their specific case and related decisions to be made, and asking them for consent before taking any actions in their name. Basically, making sure they adhere to their overall obligation to act in their clients’ interests at all times.’

Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll