header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 June 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

A cautionary tale

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7799_dobson

Nicholas Dobson discusses a councillor grievance over conduct sanctions

  • A parish council acted unlawfully in purporting to impose sanctions on a councillor under its grievance procedure when the matter should have been handled under code of conduct provisions in the Localism Act 2011.

Can a parish council bypass the statutory local government conduct regime by imposing a range of extensive sanctions on a councillor under its grievance procedure? No, said Mrs Justice Cockerill on 15 May 2018 in R (Harvey) v Ledbury Town Council and Herefordshire County Council [2018] EWHC 1151 (Admin). For there she found that the parish council in question had had no power to act as it did. But even if the powers had been available, the council would still have acted unlawfully in terms of procedural and substantive unfairness.

Factual background

The case surrounded Councillor Elizabeth Harvey, a member of Ledbury Town Council (the council—legally a parish council under the Local Government Act 1972) who sat on all three of the council’s main committees (finance, planning and environment). Following

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Read All
APIL sees off ‘substantial prejudice’ defence
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll