header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A cautionary tale

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
28 June 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7799_dobson

Nicholas Dobson discusses a councillor grievance over conduct sanctions

  • A parish council acted unlawfully in purporting to impose sanctions on a councillor under its grievance procedure when the matter should have been handled under code of conduct provisions in the Localism Act 2011.

Can a parish council bypass the statutory local government conduct regime by imposing a range of extensive sanctions on a councillor under its grievance procedure? No, said Mrs Justice Cockerill on 15 May 2018 in R (Harvey) v Ledbury Town Council and Herefordshire County Council [2018] EWHC 1151 (Admin). For there she found that the parish council in question had had no power to act as it did. But even if the powers had been available, the council would still have acted unlawfully in terms of procedural and substantive unfairness.

Factual background

The case surrounded Councillor Elizabeth Harvey, a member of Ledbury Town Council (the council—legally a parish council under the Local Government Act 1972) who sat on all three of the council’s main committees (finance, planning and environment). Following

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Gold on Awaab’s Law & digital divorce
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
NLJ this week: AI in the dock—courts need literacy, not fear
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Landlords lose their upward climb
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
NLJ this week: Privy Council undresses the ‘shareholder rule’
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
NLJ this week: Regan’s case of the year
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll