header-logo header-logo

16 October 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Mike Wilson, managing partner at leading UK law firm Blake Morgan LLP, has been appointed chair of the CBI’s South-East Council. A longstanding member of the council, Wilson brings deep regional insight and extensive leadership experience to the role. Having joined Blake Morgan in 2012 and becoming managing partner in 2016, he has overseen the firm’s strategic growth while ensuring it remains values-driven and regionally focused.

Known for championing an inclusive, people-first culture, Wilson has led a period of cultural transformation at Blake Morgan, creating meaningful career opportunities and achieving retention rates well above the industry average. His strategic restructuring of the firm has also delivered strong returns for stakeholders, strengthening its position within the UK legal market.

Anneka Hendrick, CBI London and South-East director, said: ‘I’m delighted to welcome Mike as chair-elect of the CBI South-East Council. A valued councillor for many years, his boardroom expertise, extensive networks, and commitment to inclusive growth make him an outstanding choice to champion the voice of South-East businesses.’

Commenting on his appointment, Wilson said: ‘It is an immense privilege to be appointed chair of the CBI’s South-East Council. The need to drive sustainable growth through investment across all sectors is paramount. We need a vibrant, modern economy, and it is more important now than ever that the CBI continues to advocate for businesses in a practical, optimistic way.’ He added that he looks forward to working with colleagues across London and the South-East to help the region seize new opportunities through the CBI network.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll