header-logo header-logo

CC judgment interest

04 June 2010
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

I understand that judgment debt interest in the county court ceases to run if and when enforcement action is taken?

I understand that judgment debt interest in the county court ceases to run if and when enforcement action is taken. Does an application for a charging order rank as enforcement for this purpose?

No. The County Courts (Interest on Judgment Debts) Order 1991 (SI 1991/1184) which establishes the creditor’s entitlement to interest on a judgment debt of at least £5,000 expressly excludes an application for a charging order as an enforcement step which would otherwise stop interest running. If other enforcement action fails to produce any payment from the debtor then interest is unaffected.

A wily debtor might pay a nominal sum under a warrant of execution and thereby stop judgment debt interest running for good. A creditor will avoid this trap if he enforces in the High Court where he is able to do so.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll