header-logo header-logo

26 October 2012 / Edward Heaton , Anna Heenan
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Is change ahead?

Ed Heaton & Anna Heenan consider the Law Commission’s consultation on matrimonial property, needs & agreements

On 11 September 2012, the Law Commission published a consultation paper on Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements. This supplements the Commission’s 2011 consultation on marital property agreements (often known as pre- and post-nups).

The consultation paper requests the views of the public and practitioners alike on two fundamental issues relating to the law of finances on divorce and the dissolution of a civil partnership (although, for ease of reference, this article will only refer to divorce going forward). The issues are as follows:

  • The law relating to financial needs on divorce (and, in particular, the extent of an individual’s ongoing obligation to support their former spouse and the level of that support); and
  • The legal status of “non-matrimonial property” (and, specifically, what constitutes non-matrimonial property and the extent to which such property should be treated separately from property which is the product of the marriage).

Since the consultation paper raises complex issues and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll