header-logo header-logo

Is change ahead?

26 October 2012 / Edward Heaton , Anna Heenan
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Ed Heaton & Anna Heenan consider the Law Commission’s consultation on matrimonial property, needs & agreements

On 11 September 2012, the Law Commission published a consultation paper on Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements. This supplements the Commission’s 2011 consultation on marital property agreements (often known as pre- and post-nups).

The consultation paper requests the views of the public and practitioners alike on two fundamental issues relating to the law of finances on divorce and the dissolution of a civil partnership (although, for ease of reference, this article will only refer to divorce going forward). The issues are as follows:

  • The law relating to financial needs on divorce (and, in particular, the extent of an individual’s ongoing obligation to support their former spouse and the level of that support); and
  • The legal status of “non-matrimonial property” (and, specifically, what constitutes non-matrimonial property and the extent to which such property should be treated separately from property which is the product of the marriage).

Since the consultation paper raises complex issues and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll