header-logo header-logo

The changing of the guard

10 January 2014 / John McMullen
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
web_mcmullen

John McMullen surveys cases on service provision change, transfer of employment rights, & objection to transfer

Can there be a service provision change (SPC) within the meaning of regulation 3(1)(b) of TUPE, even though the client is not obliged to guarantee any level of work to the service provider? Yes, said the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Lorne Stewart Plc v (1) Hyde (2) Crowley (3) Planned Maintenance Engineering Ltd t/a Carillion (UKEAT/0408/12).

Carillion held a contract for maintenance work for Cornwall County Council under a “framework agreement”. Work was given to Carillion under this agreement, although the council was empowered to place it elsewhere and, also, Carillion had the ability to decline work offered to it. But in practice, the council gave all the work to Carillion and Carillion accepted it when given. The contract came to an end and, after a retendering process, Lorne Stewart Plc (LS) took over the service under an agreement containing similar provisions to the expired agreement with Carillion. LS refused to take Messrs Hyde

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll