header-logo header-logo

A changing landscape?

How will the case of Edwards influence the future of wrongful dismissal claims? Spencer Keen & Jennifer Lee report

The law of unfair dismissal provides a remedy to employees whose termination has breached the generally accepted norms of industrial fairness set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996. On the other hand an action for wrongful dismissal provides a remedy based squarely on the law of contract. Practitioners have been advising clients about the practical effects of choosing between a wrongful dismissal case in the county court and an unfair dismissal case in the tribunal for many years. Most practitioners learn, at an early stage of their careers, the difference between the rules governing the award of compensation in both jurisdictions.

While the statutory cap on compensation for unfair dismissal has crept upwards (it is now £63,500) the rules governing the award of damages for wrongful dismissal have remained, for the most part, not only stable but also consistent with the general principles of contract law. In Gunton v Richmond Upon Thames

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll