header-logo header-logo

Changing the law on change in the law: Part 1

263042
© Getty images

Professor Graham Zellick KC reviews the evolution of legal developments on past convictions

  • A change in the common law can cast doubt on a past conviction, but the Court of Appeal’s ‘substantial injustice’ test may prevent an appeal from being heard.
  • The author traces the conflict between that test and the Criminal Cases Review Commission’s statutory powers.

The Law Commission in its consultation paper on criminal appeals (Consultation Paper 268, 2025, Chapter 10) rightly invited comments on the impact of developments in the common law on past convictions. The issue raises difficult and important questions of criminal law and public policy, but it also prompts some personal reflections and reminiscences concerning the present state of the law.

Fundamental tension

The unusual story that unfolds involves a clash of principles, of institutions, and of courts and reveals a disturbing irregularity in judicial proceedings. At the root of the problem is the tension between two fundamental principles of our legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll