header-logo header-logo

18 September 2015 / Alexander Bastin
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Charging ahead

nlj_7668_bastin

Alexander Bastin provides advice on how to avoid the service charge minefield

Whether rightly or wrongly, it is a common perception among property litigators that every block of flats in the country contains at least one refusenik whose sole purpose in life is to avoid paying their service charges and, generally, interfere in the management of the block. This combined with the ever-increasing complexity of service-charge related legislation and the, usually, costs-free First-tier Tribunal regime (always check the lease for a contractual costs clause) makes block management something of a minefield. Recently it has become ever easier for those responsible for managing a block to err inadvertently and find that expenditure (and money spent trying to recover expenditure) is irrecoverable.

Lessee management

At the same time, it is increasingly common to find lessees managing their block themselves (hopefully through a managing agent) whether by virtue of having the right to manage, collective enfranchisement or the freeholder / developer setting up a lessee-owned company to own and / or undertake the administration and management of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll