header-logo header-logo

17 April 2025
Issue: 8114 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Chatbot & AI guidance refresh for judges

Judges, clerks and support staff have been issued with updated guidance on artificial intelligence (AI)

This replaces guidance given in December 2023. It includes a warning that AI chatbots are now being used by unrepresented litigants, and may be the only source of assistance they receive.

‘If it appears an AI chatbot may have been used to prepare submissions or other documents, it is appropriate to inquire about this, ask what checks for accuracy have been undertaken (if any), and inform the litigant that they are responsible for what they put to the court/tribunal,’ the guidance states.

Indications of chatbot or AI usage include US spelling, unfamiliar citations of cases, content that is persuasive but has obvious substantive errors, and references to unfamiliar or overseas cases.

The guidance, issued this week by Baroness Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, and other senior judiciary, also adds new sections on misinformation, bias and dataset quality, expands the glossary of AI terms and introduces Microsoft Copilot Chat for judicial office holders through eJudiciary accounts. It reassures judges that, as long as they are logged into their eJudiciary accounts, data entered into Copilot remains secure and private.

View the guidance here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll