header-logo header-logo

24 March 2023 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Opinion , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Legal services , Cyber
printer mail-detail

ChatGPT: Time to get on board?

115862
We should seize the opportunities presented by new models of artificial intelligence to improve the provision of legal advice, says Roger Smith

You will have heard of ChatGPT. Media coverage and public awareness has been extraordinary. It gained one million users within five days of its launch in November last year. Since then, it has rarely been out of the news. By February, Henry Kissinger and his co-writers in the Wall Street Journal were heralding it as ‘an intellectual revolution’ comparable to the Gutenberg Bible.

For those in legal tech, there is little surprising perhaps in ChatGPT: much of what it can do is already available in existing products. The potentially revolutionary impact on the law probably lies in its use of ordinary language. This is a sophisticated chatbot that can talk directly with ordinary people. So, what potential is there for products like this in the world of legal aid and access to justice?

Worth the hype?

ChatGPT is just one of a number of new-generation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll