header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014 / Barry Fletcher
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Cheering news

pp_arbitration

The LCIA is leading the way on arbitration, says Barry Fletcher

It has been 16 years, a generation in international arbitration terms, since the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) last revised its arbitration rules, so the release in February this year of a “final draft” of the LCIA Rules 2014 was greeted with great interest and prompted much discussion within the ever-sociable arbitration community.

A little background

The focus of this article is the “general guidelines” for party legal representatives in the Annex to the LCIA Rules 2014, which, in accordance with the revised “preamble”, expressly forms part of the LCIA Rules 2014. The inclusion of a code of conduct for legal representatives within the rules is without any comparable precedent internationally as none of the other leading arbitral institutions (ie ICC, Swiss, SCC, DIAC, HKIAC, SIAC and CIETAC) have so far taken this step (although the ICDR included a “placeholder” provision in Art 16 of its revised rules in force from 1 June 2014).

There is often unhelpful uncertainty regarding the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll