header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014 / Barry Fletcher
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Cheering news

pp_arbitration

The LCIA is leading the way on arbitration, says Barry Fletcher

It has been 16 years, a generation in international arbitration terms, since the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) last revised its arbitration rules, so the release in February this year of a “final draft” of the LCIA Rules 2014 was greeted with great interest and prompted much discussion within the ever-sociable arbitration community.

A little background

The focus of this article is the “general guidelines” for party legal representatives in the Annex to the LCIA Rules 2014, which, in accordance with the revised “preamble”, expressly forms part of the LCIA Rules 2014. The inclusion of a code of conduct for legal representatives within the rules is without any comparable precedent internationally as none of the other leading arbitral institutions (ie ICC, Swiss, SCC, DIAC, HKIAC, SIAC and CIETAC) have so far taken this step (although the ICDR included a “placeholder” provision in Art 16 of its revised rules in force from 1 June 2014).

There is often unhelpful uncertainty regarding the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll