header-logo header-logo

15 July 2016 / Phillip Patterson
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Chilcot delays

Phillip Patterson examines a major cause of the hold-up of the Iraq Inquiry report

The Iraq Inquiry, chaired by Sir John Chilcot, has finally reported. Regrettably, this inquiry has become synonymous as much with the time it has taken to report as with its careful and detailed findings on a range of issues relating to the Iraq War.

Frustrations over delays in the publication of public inquiry reports are not new. Political sketch-writers have painted an amusing, though almost certainly inaccurate, picture of Sir John endlessly procrastinating rather than putting pen to paper.

On 26 August 2015, when the political clamour for publication reached a crescendo, Sir John issued a statement which identified a major cause of the delays in publication as being a process described as “Maxwellisation”. Sir John said: “Some have questioned why Maxwellisation is happening at all. We consider it an essential part of the Inquiry’s procedures, in order to ensure that conclusions drawn by the Inquiry are robust and that any criticism included in the final report is soundly based, fair and reasonable.”

What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll