header-logo header-logo

Chilcot delays

15 July 2016 / Phillip Patterson
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Phillip Patterson examines a major cause of the hold-up of the Iraq Inquiry report

The Iraq Inquiry, chaired by Sir John Chilcot, has finally reported. Regrettably, this inquiry has become synonymous as much with the time it has taken to report as with its careful and detailed findings on a range of issues relating to the Iraq War.

Frustrations over delays in the publication of public inquiry reports are not new. Political sketch-writers have painted an amusing, though almost certainly inaccurate, picture of Sir John endlessly procrastinating rather than putting pen to paper.

On 26 August 2015, when the political clamour for publication reached a crescendo, Sir John issued a statement which identified a major cause of the delays in publication as being a process described as “Maxwellisation”. Sir John said: “Some have questioned why Maxwellisation is happening at all. We consider it an essential part of the Inquiry’s procedures, in order to ensure that conclusions drawn by the Inquiry are robust and that any criticism included in the final report is soundly based, fair and reasonable.”

What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll