header-logo header-logo

Chilcot delays

15 July 2016 / Phillip Patterson
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Phillip Patterson examines a major cause of the hold-up of the Iraq Inquiry report

The Iraq Inquiry, chaired by Sir John Chilcot, has finally reported. Regrettably, this inquiry has become synonymous as much with the time it has taken to report as with its careful and detailed findings on a range of issues relating to the Iraq War.

Frustrations over delays in the publication of public inquiry reports are not new. Political sketch-writers have painted an amusing, though almost certainly inaccurate, picture of Sir John endlessly procrastinating rather than putting pen to paper.

On 26 August 2015, when the political clamour for publication reached a crescendo, Sir John issued a statement which identified a major cause of the delays in publication as being a process described as “Maxwellisation”. Sir John said: “Some have questioned why Maxwellisation is happening at all. We consider it an essential part of the Inquiry’s procedures, in order to ensure that conclusions drawn by the Inquiry are robust and that any criticism included in the final report is soundly based, fair and reasonable.”

What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll