17 June 2016 / David Burrows

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family

Child benefit

When does the common law listen to the child, asks David Burrows

Can children’s evidence in family proceedings be dealt with in a way analogous with such evidence in criminal proceedings?
Are special measures for child evidence available in children proceedings?
How does the law balance fairness to alleged abusers with the welfare of child witnesses?

In Richardson v Richardson [2011] EWCA Civ 79, [2011] All ER (D) 86 (Feb) Lord Justice Munby (now Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division) reminded everyone (at para [53]) that “the Family Division is part of the High Court. It is not some legal Alsatia where the common law and equity do not apply. The rules of agency [in that particular case] apply there as much as elsewhere….” And so it is, surely, with the application of rules about children’s evidence?

This article asks: do common law rules apply in family proceedings in the same way as they do, for example, for children’s evidence in criminal proceedings? And, if so, does a family

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Child benefit

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family

When does the common law listen to the child, asks David Burrows

Can children’s evidence in family proceedings be dealt with in a way analogous with such evidence in criminal proceedings?
Are special measures for child evidence available in children proceedings?
How does the law balance fairness to alleged abusers with the welfare of child witnesses?

This article asks: do common law rules apply in family proceedings in the same way as they do, for example, for children’s evidence in criminal proceedings? And, if so, does a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

Twenty Essex—Thomas Hibbs, Jack Hollingworth & Sam Pearce

Three new tenants join Twenty Essex

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws

The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations

NLJ this week: Telecoms tenants caught in a legal gap

A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

NLJ this week: Due process holds the line

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

NLJ this week: Credit law’s regulatory reset

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules

NLJ this week: Employment law’s four-point check

The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause

Error message

Child benefit

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Twenty Essex—Thomas Hibbs, Jack Hollingworth & Sam Pearce