header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Child benefit

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
17 June 2016 / David Burrows
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7703_burrows

When does the common law listen to the child, asks David Burrows

  • Can children’s evidence in family proceedings be dealt with in a way analogous with such evidence in criminal proceedings?

  • Are special measures for child evidence available in children proceedings?

  • How does the law balance fairness to alleged abusers with the welfare of child witnesses?

In Richardson v Richardson [2011] EWCA Civ 79, [2011] All ER (D) 86 (Feb) Lord Justice Munby (now Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division) reminded everyone (at para [53]) that “the Family Division is part of the High Court. It is not some legal Alsatia where the common law and equity do not apply. The rules of agency [in that particular case] apply there as much as elsewhere….” And so it is, surely, with the application of rules about children’s evidence?

This article asks: do common law rules apply in family proceedings in the same way as they do, for example, for children’s evidence in criminal proceedings? And, if so, does a family

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll